metaxu: a barrier that can act as a medium of connection . . .
polis: a city or state, the civic or public square . . .
metaxupolis: where iconoclasm and iconophilia become strange bedfellows to work upon the art of the possible
The Pink Flamingos has been following the attacks by anti-immigrant folks against McCain (& Sen. Lindsey Graham) in South Carolina. It's a fascinating read, that also brings up some larger questions for the GOP:
Why do anti-abortion conservatives endorse an agenda by one of the most ardent supporters of abortion there is? Why do small government conservatives basically demand a creation of 'BigBrother' to monitor anyone who isn't a certain color or racial mix? Why do conservatives who constantly complain about government intervention into private affairs demand government intrude in every business in the country in order to remove all illegal aliens?
Townhall's Matt Lewis considers here this exchange:
Is it normal for a candidate not to view his own ads before sending them out with his endorsement? Do you think Mitt will take a look at the bills Congress sends him before signing them?
This ad, entitled "Consider," is not what I'd call a high point in the candidacy of a man who should clearly be our next president. After I first watched it I had to watch it again and again to see if I'd missed something, that maybe it wasn't so negative as I thought.
Then I realized what it was that I couldn't figure out. Check out the graphic of the Concord Monitor article versus the voice-over at seconds 23-24.
Look for the words "Mitt Romney is such a candidate" on the graphic. It's not there. It indeed *is* in the original article, but the ad makes it ambiguous as to whether this is the McCain campaign's summary rather than a direct quote.
That the producer of this ad would leave this ambiguous is astounding. This is an egregious mistake. It makes McCain out to seem - if not nastier than Mitt, then at least more sloppy about it.
The ad should have stuck with just the positive words of the conservative Union Leader, or any of a plethora of others. But instead it implied that a great American is a phony. I don't mean Mitt Romney, whom voters have a hard time trusting anyway. I mean John McCain, who is better than that, and deserves much better.
A neo-Old Whig,unregistered Republican, crunchy con artist, a bleeding heart libertarian, vegetarian trinitarian universalist
In this political season that waxes and wanes but seems all too much with us in our democratic experiment, I hope to explore that which seperates and connects, the matrix of the betwixt and between - partisanship and poetry, platforms and principles, time-sensitive and transcendance, vote and virtue, ideal and intuition.